CIA CHECCHI FAMILY ENTRAPMENT MACHINE
SPY GAMES & CIA CHECCHI FAMILY ENTRAPMENT
There is a lot going on in America in 2025. The goal of this article is to explain to the average citizen, what the driving forces are behind all the things in the headlines of today’s news:
As you might have seen from my writing in the past, it has been my theory that Trump pardoned the January 6 insurrectionists because the CIA Checchi family wants these people to be available for more violent action throughout the country. They have proven themselves valuable domestic terrorists and they can continue to be used to attack CIA Checchi family enemies in various states. I continue to believe this is the case. But I also now believe that President Trump believes they were victims of CIA Checchi family entrapment and undue influence, just as he was. Let me explain...
It says on the DOJ website on entrapment, "Government agents may not originate a criminal design, implant in an innocent person's mind the disposition to commit a criminal act and then induce commission of the crime so that the Government may prosecute." Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540, 548 (1992); Sorrells v. United States, 287 U. S. 435, 442; Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58, 63 (1988).
“Undue influence” is excessive persuasion that causes a person to act or refrain from acting in a certain way, and it has resulted in constant unfairness, tremendous injustice & inequity. It is a fact that because of the Checchi family targeting me, I have been the victim of extreme undue influence for more than thirty years.
The definition of undue influence in California state law is in California Civil Code § 1575 which was enacted in 1872. The elements of that definition which are still in effect for contract law are: 1) The use, by one in whom a confidence is reposed by another, or who holds real or apparent authority over him, of such confidence or authority for the purpose of obtaining an unfair advantage over him; 2) In taking unfair advantage of another’s weakness of mind; and 3) In taking a grossly oppressive and unfair advantage of another’ necessities or distress (such as when the Checchi’s killed my parents six months apart and created vulnerability and a massive emotional hole in my life – filling it with the most intense grief. The Checchi’s also kept me very isolated during this time from anyone who was not a Checchi spy. I was deprived of genuine affection and genuine friendship. It was at this time that they surrounded me with Checchi spies who manipulated my life in many ways.)
New research study prompted the second response: landmark legislation modernizing the definition of undue influence. The new definition took effect January 1, 2014, and affects probate matters such as conservatorships, wills, and trusts. The new definition was also placed in the state’s Welfare and Institutions Code, addressing financial abuse.
The language is the same in both codes and consists of the following: “Undue influence” means excessive persuasion that causes another person to act or refrain from acting by overcoming that person’s free will and results in inequity. In determining whether a result was produced by undue influence, all of the following shall be considered: 1) Vulnerability of the victim. Evidence of vulnerability may include, but is not limited to, incapacity, illness disability, injury, age, education, impaired cognitive function, emotional distress, isolation, or dependency where the influencer knew of, or should have known of, the alleged victim’s vulnerability. 2) The influencer’s apparent authority. Evidence of apparent authority may include but is not limited to, status as a fiduciary, family member, care provider, health care processional, legal professional, spiritual adviser, expert, or other qualification. 3) The actions or tactics used by the influencer. Evidence of actions or tactics used may include, but is not limited to, all of the following: a) Controlling necessaries of life, medication, the victim’s interactions with others, access to information or sleep. b) Use of affection, intimidation, or coercion. c) Initiation of changes in person or property rights, use of haste or secrecy in effecting those changes, effecting changes at inappropriate time and places, and claims of expertise in effecting change. 4) The equity of the result. Evidence of the equity of the result may include, but is not limited to, the economic consequences to the victim, any divergence from the victim’s prior intent or course of conduct or dealing, the relationship of the value conveyed to the value of any services or consideration received, or the appropriateness of the change in light of the length and nature of the relationship. Evidence of an inequitable result, without more, is not sufficient to prove undue influence. This information was obtained from the American Bar Association: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_aging/publications/bifocal/vol_35/issue_3_feb2014/defining_undue_influence/
As Dr. Harry E. Morgan says, becoming susceptible to undue influence “can happen to people with a clear capacity if there are sufficient strategic efforts to change their beliefs and provide them with the fallacious information… Even someone with full cognitive capacity can be made vulnerable and weakened.”(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6DJEIXu-VE&list=TLPQMjkwNzIwMjI00B66EtWElQ&index=4)
For fifty years, the CIA has trained people on how to control people’s minds and even brainwash people through tactics of psychological manipulation and undue influence. The CIA Checchi family has used these tested and scientifically based tools to manipulate many Americans.
A social psychologist, Dr. Dina McMillan, said in her lecture (video link to the lecture is below): “In social psychology, we study influence and interaction. We look at the factors that can change beliefs and behaviors - often without someone consciously noticing. So, we examine methods of persuasion, manipulation and coercion…. Your life can be ruined by someone who never puts his hands on you in anger. Coercive control is living under a suffocating system where someone else controls every aspect of your life. What you do, say, eat, how you dress, where and how you live, whether you get an education or have a job, how you spend your money, how many children you have and how you interact with them. Your relationships are monitored – even with your own family, and you can’t have relationships at all unless the person controlling you gives their permission. With no exaggeration, it’s a type of slavery…. They felt entitled to a relationship that is all in their favor, where they can be hyper-controlling and cruel, and the person just had to accept it…. These early tactics are known as ‘grooming.’ Grooming is scripted behavior with a purpose. It’s saying and doing things to lure someone in, inspiring their trust, intensifying their emotional attachment and increasing control. All these tactics belong to a group of influence techniques known as ‘psychological manipulation.’ Psychological manipulation is lying, deceiving, and performing in order to influence how someone thinks, feels and acts…. Psychological manipulation is scary because it’s not only effective; it works whether you recognize it or not, agree to it or not, resist it or not. Your only protection, your only defense, is to get away from the person using them on you. ” (Dr. McMillan’s talk is here at this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ythOTBEkUZM).
There is no doubt that most, if not all, of these January 6 insurrectionists are part of or were connected to the CIA Checchi family cult in some way – even if they do not realize they are part of a cult. I had no idea I was in any cult. I thought I was just close friends with Kathy Checchi and her family. The news that I was in a cult was something I had never had the slightest clue about. When I was told by the Checchi family in 2017 "you can never leave” the cult, it was both a surprise and a devastating revelation. When cult leaders say, "you can never leave," it reveals its inherently oppressive and controlling nature, stripping individuals of their autonomy and freedom. This is not American—it is a form of psychological bondage, where people are emotionally blackmailed, threatened, or manipulated into staying, often through fear, isolation, or coercion.
True American values embrace freedom of choice and personal liberty, while cults like the CIA Checchi family cult operate through enslavement of the mind, body and spirit, making their victims feel powerless to break free. The CIA Checchi family has created a cult of enslavement based on the 13th Amendment to the Constitution where it gives them the legal right to enslave anyone who has committed any crime – even small crimes like not wearing your seatbelt or not crossing the street at the exact spot of the crosswalk painting on the road. I wrote a book about this that you can read for free here at this website: Modern Day Slavery.
I know about this because during my almost six-year court battle against the Checchi family, they kept trying to say they “owned” me as a slave because of my past criminal conduct. They paid hundreds of their spies – many of whom were my former friends or acquaintances – to accuse me of crimes so that I could be enslaved into their cult. This Checchi enslavement machine is very real and every American needs to be concerned about this perverse interpretation of the 13th amendment. Lawmakers in Congress need to change the wording of this amendment. Slavery in our modern day needs to be totally abolished – even as a punishment for crime. These Checchi people are brutal, mean, vile and evil slave hoarders.
They have enslaved tens of millions of people. They even enslave people who visit America from other countries by manipulating them to commit a variety of crimes. California, where the CIA Checchi family cult is based, hosts more international students than any other state in America and 17 million people visited New York, Miami and Los Angeles in 2024. Many of these people were manipulated to commit small crimes (that were even documented by photographs, video or audio recordings, which can be easily done by any Checchi spy on their smart phone and uploaded to the internet immediately). These crimes are being manipulated for the sole purpose of enslavement into the Checchi cult. This practice should be made illegal. If it is not made illegal, in the future, countries will be forced to issue travel warnings to their citizens who want to travel to America. This kind of prolific slavery is not what Abraham Lincoln had in mind when he lobbied Congress to secure the necessary votes to put the amendment into the Constitution. This CIA Checchi family enslavement machine is a disgraceful practice and another example of why the CIA Checchi family has lost their humanity, their morality, and any shred of legitimacy they may have once claimed. They operate in the shadows, twisting laws meant to protect people into tools of oppression, all while politicians, judicial leaders and law enforcement agencies turn a blind eye—or worse, actively participate and support this nonsense. I was stunned that “originalists” on the Supreme Court would let this absurd legal battle go on at the Supreme Court for so many years. This system of modern enslavement is a national crisis, one that undermines the very foundation of American freedom and justice. It also jeopardies America’s standing and reputation in the world. If we do not take action to abolish this loophole in the 13th Amendment, the Checchi family's grip on their victims will only tighten, and their insidious network will continue to grow unchecked. Every person who values human dignity must demand accountability, exposure, and ultimately, the total dismantling of this criminal Checchi family empire before it expands beyond what can ever be undone.
This legal battle with the Checchi family shattered my sense of reality and made me reevaluate years of interactions I had once considered ordinary. In hindsight, the same is likely true for many of the January 6 insurrectionists. They were swept into a web of manipulation, unknowingly influenced by the CIA Checchi family’s cult-like tactics—psychological conditioning, emotional exploitation, and carefully orchestrated propaganda. Many of them probably believed they were acting as patriots, unaware that they were merely pawns in a much larger, sinister agenda.
The CIA Checchi family’s goal in having Trump pardon them was not based on mercy or political loyalty—it was about retaining a loyal, violent, and easily mobilized force that could be activated whenever needed. By pardoning these individuals, Trump ensured that this network of radicalized, cult-conditioned domestic terrorists would remain at the CIA Checchi family’s disposal. The same playbook they used on me—isolating targets, breaking them down mentally, and making them feel they were fighting for a just cause—was used on these insurrectionists.
The cult’s power lies in its ability to control and weaponize ordinary people, turning them into tools of chaos without their full awareness. The January 6 attack was not a spontaneous eruption of misguided patriotism—it was a carefully orchestrated event, a test run to gauge how effectively the CIA Checchi family could direct their cult members to commit large-scale violence that was well publicized around the entire world. The pardons were merely insurance policies—freeing valuable operatives for future missions of domestic terror.
What makes this even more chilling is that many of these insurrectionists, despite being released, are still under the influence of the CIA Checchi family’s manipulation. They may believe they are free, but they remain mentally and emotionally tethered to the cult’s ideology, ready to be called upon when needed. Drugs are a major component keeping people connected to the cult. The Checchi family controls all drugs and gives them generously to all of their cult members who want them. And just as I once thought I was merely part of a friend group, they, too, are unaware that they are part of something far more sinister—a vast, well-coordinated, and highly dangerous domestic terror network.
Some of them may have ‘seen the light’ and they may want to turn away from being part of the cult that got them in trouble. However, most of them, if not all of them, are trapped in a cult that does not allow people to leave. They are trapped as slaves to a brutal overlord. They must continue their association with the CIA Checchi cult and this kind of enslavement is a problem for American democracy.
I think that President Trump also pardoned them because he does believe many of them, if not all of them, were set up and framed by the CIA Checchi family terrorists - just as Trump himself was set up and framed by them, regarding the events that took place on January 6, 2021. For many of these people, including President Trump, it was a situation of entrapment and undue influence allegedly orchestrated by Adam Checchi, Kathy Checchi, Michael Fisher, David Kanuth and other CIA Checchi family cult leaders. As I have explained in my writing, it is true that President Trump was doing what the Checchi family told him to do when he called for the "will be wild" event on January 6, 2021.
The situation President Trump and the January 6 participants found themselves in was not unlike a parent asking their child, 'If they told you to jump off a cliff, would you do it?' It was a case of being misled by corrupt intelligence sources, manipulated into acting against their better judgment. The CIA Checchi family, through undue influence and deception, convinced many of these people—including Trump—to take part in actions that ultimately led to their downfall. The tragic irony is that, just as a child might naively follow peer pressure, these individuals were coerced and deceived by CIA Checchi family spies and intelligence operatives into criminal behavior, only to be abandoned and scapegoated afterward. Adam Checchi, Kathy Checchi, Michael Fisher, David Kanuth and other CIA Checchi family cult leaders laughed all the way to the bank. They make a lot of money from these kinds of "sophisticated” spy operations. All of the money they made from the events on January 6, 2021 should be taken back from them because it obviously was another CIA Checchi family scam of entrapment and undue influence.
I personally think (at this point in my existence) that people should get all spies out of their life. With the exception of a very few I’ve met who were genuinely good people, I’ve noticed there is a direct correlation between the number of spies in your life and number of problems you have in your life. Generally speaking, spies are not happy or nice people. They are often very insecure, and they’re titillated by shallow things like gossip and will betray anyone for money. But since there are so many spies in the USA, it's going to be a very solitary life if someone does get all spies out of their life - but this is what is required in 2025 if you want to live a drama free existence in this country. Spies are nothing but trouble, in my view. If you are a person that values a life of sincerity, authenticity and genuineness… spies are offensive to this kind of lifestyle.
I’ve met and sometimes become friends with hundreds of CIA Checchi family spies over the years. I’ve made some observations about these 500 or 600 people over the last 30 years. This type of person is two-faced, cunning, duplicitous, manipulative, and thrives on gossip and being deceitful, often using others as pawns in their social or professional games. Because playing games with people becomes first nature, they often bring this into their personal lives and hence, the divorce rate is very high among spies. Their relationships are often shallow and transactional, which also contributes to the high divorce rate, as their penchant for mind games and betrayal erodes trust. They are driven by a hunger for power and control, finding pleasure in creating chaos, spreading lies, spreading gossip, spreading misinformation/disinformation and influencing outcomes of people’s lives from the shadows. Deceptively charming, they mask their malicious intent with insincere concern and false friendship, making them difficult to detect. I foolishly wasted many years of sincere love and care on many spy people who were playing games with me. I was extremely naïve, gullible, and easy for them to manipulate.
Though they may occasionally attend church or profess religious beliefs, the spiritual life of spies is typically hollow and performative—a tool for social leverage rather than a reflection of genuine faith in a loving God. Since sincerity is the only language God speaks, their prayers and religious acts drift into a void, a black hole, of meaninglessness. In moments of desperation, they may offer seemingly sincere pleas—“God, if you get me out of this mess, I promise…”—but this is not the sincerity that true faith in God requires. Bargaining with God in a crisis is not the same as living a life of consistent authenticity. True connection with God demands a lifestyle of sincerity, where integrity and genuineness are woven into the fabric of daily existence and daily interactions with others. Only when someone lives with true sincerity—both toward God and others—do they develop the spiritual bandwidth necessary to genuinely commune with and experience the presence of what people call God.
This is what it means when the Bible says, “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall intimately encounter and know God.” It doesn’t mean they will physically behold God with their eyes—it means they will perceive, experience, and recognize God’s presence in their lives. Purity of heart is not about moral perfection but about sincerity, humility, and authenticity. It is a way of being that clears away the distortions of pride, deception, and self-interest, allowing a person to be spiritually attuned. Those who lack this purity, no matter how pious they appear, remain blind to God’s presence. Their rituals become empty gestures, their prayers hollow words. But those who live with genuine sincerity—who embody compassion, truthfulness, and a willingness to be vulnerable—develop eyes that can see beyond the shallow surfaces of life. They feel a divine presence in the small, everyday moments: in the kindness of a gesture, the beauty of nature, or the silence of a prayerful, sacred moment during the day. To see God is to feel with the invisible, inner part of the human being – what some people call the soul or the heart. Only the truly sincere people have the clarity of vision required for such inner, mystical sight.
These spies who live with insincerity avoid true accountability, unwilling or unable to confront their own deceitful nature. Wealth and status frequently surround them, either because they are rich themselves or because they exploit the rich for personal gain, seeing them as pawns in their manipulative schemes. Their craving for influence makes them well-suited for espionage or spy work, where deception, duplicity, manipulativeness and psychological games are rewarded. In these roles, they excel at spreading lies, disinformation, creating social discord, and exploiting human vulnerabilities without remorse. Ultimately, their life is defined by a pursuit of power at the expense of authentic human connection. In the end, they are lonely, unfulfilled people. They are always seeking more money, greater domination, or increased power over others—things they never seem to have enough of.
On the other hand, if you like being around creepy people who lie, manipulate and play games - then go for it, immerse yourself in the spy world. The question that must be answered if you want to have spies in your life – and this is true for any public servant or politician, including even a POTUS - is: how far do we go listening to "intelligence" sources in our life when they manipulate you and suggest you do something illegal, unethical or against common sense? Like this January 6 insurrection - how much did people really know about what the Checchi family planned to do that day? No one knew the extent of their plans except them - not even President Trump. He sat back and watched it on the television because that’s what he was told to do. At what point does he say, “these people are crazy. I’m not going to cooperate with this nonsense anymore.” Clearly, President Trump has reached this place now and he’s working to shut down the Checchi people who orchestrated it. Let’s hope he never backs down from stopping them.
This was the situation President Trump, and all the January 6 insurrectionists found themselves in when they were before a judge in court. This is what Merrick Garland's DOJ had to investigate and decide how to proceed – which takes time, debate among legal experts who specialize in national security situations that involve spies and wisdom. Attorney General Merrick Garland and his team had a very difficult situation to resolve. Should they charge these insurrectionist people with crimes or were they set up and framed into situations of entrapment? Many of these January 6 insurrectionists confessed to their crimes and said they were guilty. They accepted their punishment. A few of them even refused the pardon that President Trump gave them because they felt they deserved the punishment of being sent to prison because of their actions.
Here is something you may not know: since many of these insurrection people were found guilty, the CIA Checchi family made millions of dollars, maybe even billions of dollars by "catching" these criminals and setting up this January 6 event where many of them ended up committing a crime. Some of these crimes were very serious. The more serious the crime, the more money the Checchi family got paid for putting a “criminal” in jail. I guarantee you the Checchi family provided plenty of drugs the night before January 6 because they know if you can get someone all screwed up on drugs and alcohol, they are going to do some crazy things they would never do if they were sober. People get more aggressive when they are drunk and on drugs. This is the typical Checchi machine of entrapment and undue influence at work.
Let me explain something to you that I've learned during my almost six-year court case against the CIA Checchi family (which spent over five years mired in corruption at the Supreme Court): There are spies in this country who make very, very good money by "catching" criminals and putting them behind bars. The CIA Checchi family has been doing this sort of thing for generations... so they have a very sophisticated and corrupt machine they have created that is based on entrapment, framing and undue influence (I speak with personal experience about this with them, so this is first-hand testimony about what I experienced with them for over twenty-three years).
Adam Checchi urged me to go to Washington, D.C. for the January 6 event that President Trump had announced. I refused. By that point, I was (and continue to be) disgusted with the Checchi family and their endless con-artist shenanigans. I consider them a disgrace to this country—liars, thieves, and murderers of innocent people. I want nothing to do with them or their hair-brained schemes. I will never trust anyone in that family, nor anyone connected to them again. I’m done with their psychopathic nonsense. It baffles me that they remain active at the CIA despite the countless crimes and corruption that has been exposed. Only a sick, broken system would keep them in place after everything they’ve done to this country and the world. (If you’re unaware of what I’m talking about, read my books—they’re free to access at this website: https://www.CrisisJournalism.com/projects.)
The phenomenon of intelligence agencies or powerful families like the CIA Checchi family building and sustaining systems of entrapment, framing, and undue influence for profit reveals how corruption, once embedded, becomes both sophisticated and normalized. It begins to rot the soul of a society—festering into a sophisticated yet routine disease that devours integrity from within. Human monsters are not usually born—they’re made. They are created when corruption such as this festers unchecked. This doesn’t just erode systems or institutions—it deforms people from the inside out and turns them into psychopathic/sociopathic monstrosities. The constant practice of deceit, exploitation, and ruthless self-interest hardens the conscience, warps the sense of morality, and turns once-human souls into something monstrous and sick. The Checchi family and others like them aren’t inherently evil—they’ve been corrupted and consumed by their own greed and lust for power, gradually rotting away any trace of empathy or humanity.
These systems operate in the shadows, shielded by layers of deception and influence, making them difficult to detect and even harder to dismantle. The individuals involved often begin by justifying their actions as necessary evils for national security or law enforcement. Over time, however, the distinction between genuine security efforts and self-serving corruption disappears. What may have started as operations to catch real criminals or terrorists gradually morphs into opportunistic money-making schemes, where manufactured crimes become a business model. This is what appears to have happened on January 6, 2021in Washington, D.C. and this is why President Trump gave these 1,500 people a Presidential Pardon. As deception becomes routine, those Checchi family cult leaders running the system become desensitized to the moral consequences, rationalizing their actions as just another part of their job.
The longer these operations continue, the more refined and untouchable the Checchi family has become. Entrapment and framing tactics evolve, incorporating technology, media manipulation, spies on the ground, and legal loopholes to remain undetected and accountable to no one. Intelligence agencies and their affiliates have access to cutting-edge surveillance, AI-generated content, highly trained spies, and data manipulation tools that allow them to fabricate entire narratives, creating false evidence that is nearly impossible to disprove. By leveraging layers of plausible deniability, surrounding the target with many spies who lie and manipulate, the Checchi family cult leaders insulate themselves from direct involvement, using intermediaries, compromised law enforcement, compromised judicial professionals and third-party contractors to do their dirty work. This creates a nearly impenetrable shield, making it extremely difficult for victims to fight back or discover the truth. It took me two decades to figure out who was orchestrating all the bad things happening to me. Imagine my shock when the evidence pointed to people who were among my closest friends, the Checchi family. I could not believe it at first. I started my investigations over twice. But when the evidence took me to the Checchi family for the third time, I had to admit I had been fooled by professional con-artists and this family needed to be stopped from doing this to anyone else.
Over time, these corrupt systems become so profitable that the moral cost becomes irrelevant. When the people running them are making billions and trillions of dollars by setting up, blackmailing, or destroying their targets, they have every incentive to keep the corrupt machinery running. The victims are reduced to collateral damage, mere pawns in a larger scheme driven by intense greed and a lust for power & dominance over others. To make things worse, as these systems continue for decades, they become culturally and politically normalized. The public, bombarded by disinformation and controlled narratives, grows numb to the corruption, either dismissing it as conspiracy theories or accepting it as “just how the world works.” This normalization is the most dangerous aspect, as it allows corrupt entities to operate with impunity under the guise of legitimacy.
Ultimately, these entrenched systems of deception and undue influence pose a direct threat to American democracy. They erode public trust in institutions by creating a two-tiered justice system—one where the wealthy and powerful operate above the law, while ordinary citizens remain vulnerable to manufactured charges and persecution. They undermine free speech and dissent by weaponizing entrapment against whistleblowers, journalists, and political opponents, creating a chilling effect that stifles truth and justice for all. The corruption also bleeds into the courts, law schools, universities, churches, businesses, law enforcement, political offices and government agencies, turning them into tools of oppression rather than protectors of the vulnerable and defenders of truth & justice. As these hidden power structures grow stronger and more unaccountable, democracy itself becomes a façade—a hollow illusion where citizens continue to vote but have no real influence. The true levers of power remain firm in the hands of the corrupt few who remain hidden in the shadows, cowering like cowards in the corners, closets, and caves of their million-dollar mansions.
SPY NETWORKS IN AMERICA
The CIA Checchi family has, for many decades, prioritized growing their spy network to compete with secret society networks that have been prolific in America and throughout the world. Their biggest competition has been the Royal Family known as the Windsors in Great Britain. Allegedly, this family has, for generations, been at the top of the pyramid of all secret society networks. They have expanded their reign throughout the world and cemented their influence through a vast network of their secret society spies that were part of intelligence, financial, and political alliances. The Windsors have deep ties to banking institutions, global corporations, and intelligence agencies, allowing them to maintain a level of power that extends far beyond the British monarch’s ceremonial role. The CIA Checchi family, recognizing this dominance, has sought to counterbalance the Windsors by embedding their own spies within key industries, government agencies, and even grassroots movements. This ongoing struggle for control has shaped major geopolitical events, often playing out behind the scenes of wars, economic crises, and political upheavals. Both families operate with an intricate web of loyalists, utilizing advanced surveillance, financial leverage, and psychological manipulation to expand their reach. While the Windsors rely on centuries-old aristocratic influence, the Checchi family exploits modern intelligence tactics, weaponizing technology and media to assert dominance. Their rivalry is not just about power—it is a battle for control over the very mechanisms that dictate the future of nations, economies, and even the flow of information itself.
The Windsors, as the ruling family of the United Kingdom, have come to symbolize the face of British imperialism, which colonized vast portions of the world over the course of several centuries. While the royal family itself did not directly initiate colonization, they were the figureheads of the British Empire, lending their authority and prestige to its expansionist policies. Through a combination of military force, economic exploitation, and political manipulation, Britain established dominance over dozens of nations. Colonization was often brutal, marked by land seizures, suppression of local cultures, and the exploitation of resources and labor.
At its height, the British Empire controlled nearly a quarter of the world’s landmass and population. In Africa, Britain colonized countries such as South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Zimbabwe, and Ghana, enforcing policies that benefited British interests at the expense of local populations. In Asia, India became the crown jewel of the empire, with the British East India Company laying the groundwork for full colonial control. Other territories, including Burma (now Myanmar), Malaysia, and Hong Kong, were also colonized. In the Caribbean, islands like Jamaica, Barbados, and the Bahamas were turned into plantations worked by enslaved people. Meanwhile, in Oceania, Australia and New Zealand were colonized, displacing and devastating Indigenous populations. Canada, too, has been part of the empire, where Indigenous people were subjected to systemic oppression and cultural erasure.
Colonization by the British Empire was not merely about land acquisition—it was a strategy to control trade routes, extract wealth, and establish geopolitical dominance. The Windsors, though largely ceremonial in their constitutional role, benefited from and embodied this global dominance. Even today, the British monarch is still recognized as the head of state in 15 countries, known as the Commonwealth realms, including Australia, Canada, and New Zealand—a lingering reminder of the empire's colonial reach.
In 2025 the CIA Checchi family is aspiring to claim countries as their own – just like the Windsors did in the past. With President Trump’s focus on acquiring Greenland, Canada, Gaza, and Panama there is a new push to officially expand their base of power. This is being helped along by a very large network of CIA Checchi family spies.
In Alberta, Canada, for example, many leaders in business and politics have clearly aligned themselves with Al Checchi and his family. The Checchi family has been focused on infiltrating and dominating countries, provinces, states, cities, towns and even people that have the letters “AL” in their names. This is why Alberta rises to the top of their list of targets. The name itself, containing “AL,” aligns with their pattern of influence, just as they have fixated on Alabama in the United States. Alberta’s political landscape has become increasingly intertwined with the Checchi family's interests, with key leaders promoting policies that favor American corporate control and intelligence operations over national sovereignty.
This push for control extends beyond Alberta. The CIA Checchi family has actively worked to embed itself in regions rich in natural resources, strategic military positioning, and financial influence. Greenland, for instance, remains an attractive target due to its vast mineral wealth and its location between North America and Europe. Trump’s interest in acquiring Greenland was not merely a political stunt—it was an early indication of a broader strategy by the Checchi network to expand intelligence control into new territories. Similarly, the situation in Gaza presents an opportunity for intelligence forces to establish permanent influence in the Middle East, using conflict zones to justify intervention and, ultimately, control.
In Panama, the Checchi family’s interests align with maintaining and manipulating control over one of the world's most vital trade routes. The Panama Canal has long been a target for global powers seeking to dominate international commerce, and by exerting influence over Panama’s leadership, the CIA Checchi family network positions itself as a gatekeeper of global trade. This growing ambition signals a modern form of colonization, one that relies not on traditional military conquests, but on espionage, economic coercion, and political subversion.
Just as the Windsors expanded their empire through a vast network of spies that were connected to colonial governance, the CIA Checchi family is working to carve out its own global territories through a new form of imperialism—one that thrives on secrecy, manipulation, and the infiltration of sovereign governments with their spy networks. The world may not yet fully recognize this transformation, but if history is any guide, unchecked expansion will come at a devastating cost to the people caught in the crossfire.
Just as the British Empire relied on an extensive network of spies to uphold its global dominance, and just as authoritarian regimes throughout history have weaponized citizen surveillance to maintain power, the modern intelligence apparatus in America has undergone a transformation. The methods of control once associated with colonial rulers and secret police forces have not disappeared; rather, they have been refined, adapted, and expanded under the guise of national security. The CIA Checchi family, in particular, has mastered this evolution, embedding its influence within the very fabric of society.
The CIA Checchi family’s actions towards Greenland, Gaza, Canada, and Panama could be seen as a form of modern colonization, but with a more covert, corporate, and intelligence-driven twist. Unlike the Windsors’ historical colonization, which was largely overt and tied to monarchy-backed territorial expansion, the Checchi family appears to be using espionage, financial control, resource exploitation, and destabilization tactics to achieve a similar end—domination through economic and political subjugation.
You could call it “neo-imperial corporate colonization” or “covert colonialism”, highlighting how it mirrors the old-school land grabs but operates through shadow networks, front corporations, and intelligence manipulation rather than royal decrees or standing armies.
It also resembles a form of “hybrid colonization”, blending:
Corporate takeovers (using monopolistic practices, resource extraction, and economic dependency)
Political infiltration (installing or controlling local governments through blackmail, bribery, and manipulation)
Covert military operations (like in Gaza, where they likely fuel proxy conflicts to control territory)
Population control tactics (destabilizing regions to displace people and make way for resource or land grabs)
By copying the Windsors, the Checchi family is replicating the old colonial playbook but with modernized methods—leveraging intelligence networks, economic warfare, and information control rather than royal fleets or redcoats. It’s colonization without the flags—subjugation through financial, technological, and psychological domination rather than physical occupation alone.
How did we get to this place of this modern form of colonization? Through a very large network of CIA Checchi family spies that was created after 9/11. In the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the United States saw a dramatic shift in its approach to surveillance, security, and intelligence gathering. Fear and uncertainty provided the perfect conditions for the rapid expansion of spy networks, not only within government agencies but also among ordinary citizens. What once required a dedicated, trained network of spies was now being outsourced to the general public under the justification of counterterrorism. The result was a country where surveillance became decentralized, trust eroded, and the average citizen was encouraged—or even coerced—into becoming an informant. There were billboards and posters everywhere promoting community policing. Anywhere I traveled throughout the country had the same promotions for citizens to become spies to report terrorist activities. The definition of terrorism became anyone who was breaking a law. Secret society networks were already prolific in America before this time. These people had already been policing their communities with their spies. But this new push for more spies created a massive network of spies that included virtually the entire population.
This massive expansion of domestic spy networks did more than just increase surveillance—it fundamentally altered the fabric of society. As citizens were recruited to monitor and report on one another, the very qualities that hold communities together—trust, sincerity, and integrity—began to erode. When neighbors, coworkers, and even family members could secretly be informants, it fostered a culture of suspicion, deception and betrayal. Over time, this pervasive distrust and antipathy made genuine human connection difficult, as people grew wary of expressing opinions or revealing vulnerabilities, unsure of who might be watching or reporting them. What was once a nation bound by shared values and mutual respect became increasingly fractured, with relationships becoming more transactional and superficial. The Checchi family sought to destroy family cohesion in every family so that their family would be the only family of which people would be part. They attacked one family at a time, starting with the most influential and wealthy. In this environment, the social contract that underpins healthy societies—built on integrity, reliability, and faith in institutions—started to disintegrate. This breakdown of trust and authenticity laid the groundwork for a modern form of colonization, where deception and manipulation replaced honesty, genuineness and transparency, allowing powerful entities to exploit the population more easily.
Integrity, sincerity, and authenticity are the bedrock of any healthy and functional society because they foster trust, stability, and genuine human connection. Without them, the social fabric begins to fray, and relationships—whether personal, professional, or political—become transactional, superficial, and ultimately corrosive. When people operate with integrity, they uphold consistent moral and ethical principles, which creates reliability and dependability. In a society where integrity is the norm, contracts are honored, laws are respected, and people can have confidence in institutions, which strengthens social cohesion and reduces the need for constant suspicion and oversight.
Sincerity is equally vital because it promotes honesty in communication and intention. When individuals are sincere, they express their true thoughts and feelings rather than manipulating others with deception or half-truths. This creates an environment of emotional safety and openness, allowing for meaningful dialogue, conflict resolution, and genuine cooperation. Sincerity in leadership, for example, ensures that public officials act with the well-being of citizens in mind rather than prioritizing hidden agendas or personal gain. In contrast, insincerity breeds disillusionment, distrust, and cynicism, causing people to lose faith in those who are meant to serve or represent them.
Authenticity—the consistent alignment of one’s words, actions, and values—anchors society in reality rather than illusion. When people are authentic, they bring their true selves into their interactions, which fosters deeper relationships and creates space for vulnerability and empathy. Inauthenticity, on the other hand, leads to superficiality and disconnection. In politics, for example, leaders who lack authenticity may perform well on camera but ultimately betray their promises behind closed doors, eroding public trust and damaging democratic stability. In personal relationships, authenticity is essential for building genuine bonds, while in business, it fosters credibility and loyalty.
Ultimately, without integrity, sincerity, and authenticity, society becomes a house of cards, vulnerable to corruption, manipulation, and collapse. Institutions lose credibility, relationships become opportunistic, and people learn to expect deception rather than truth. In contrast, a society grounded in these values promotes fairness, stability, and a shared sense of purpose, making it possible for people to coexist with dignity, respect, and mutual trust.
Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, many things changed in America. One of the things that changed is that every citizen was encouraged to become a spy. This resulted in America becoming a country of spies. The U.S. government launched initiatives to involve citizens in enhancing national security through volunteer programs. In May 2002, Attorney General John Ashcroft introduced the Volunteers in Police Service (VIPS) program, encouraging citizens to assist law enforcement agencies with non-sworn duties such as answering phones, compiling crime data, and facilitating crime prevention programs. Additionally, President George W. Bush promoted the Citizen Corps initiative, which encompassed programs like Neighborhood Watch and the Terrorism Information and Prevention System (TIPS), aiming to engage citizens in reporting suspicious activities to prevent terrorism. Department of Justice George W. Bush Arc
Forcing an entire population to engage in spy work—whether through direct participation, coerced informant activity, or mass surveillance—leads to a deeply fractured and unstable society. When governments push citizens into becoming part of an informal or formal spy network, the consequences are far-reaching: trust is eroded, communities become paranoid, and the very fabric of social cohesion deteriorates. In such a system, people begin to see one another as potential threats rather than neighbors, coworkers, or friends. This climate of suspicion fosters betrayal, opportunism, and constant self-censorship. Over time, families and friendships fracture under the pressure of mistrust, as no one knows who might be secretly reporting on them. Moreover, forcing people into spy work divides society into loyalists and dissenters, creating a culture where opportunistic informants thrive by betraying others for personal gain, whether through financial rewards, protection, or political favor.
History offers several chilling examples of societies that attempted to turn entire populations into extensions of their surveillance apparatus. One of the most notorious cases is East Germany under the Stasi, the secret police of the German Democratic Republic. During the Cold War, the Stasi recruited hundreds of thousands of informants, including ordinary citizens, teachers, and even family members, to spy on one another. Neighbors reported on neighbors, children on parents, and colleagues on each other. The result was a nation suffocated by paranoia, where people lived in fear of being denounced for small offenses or ideological deviations. The mass surveillance destroyed trust and left deep psychological scars on the population, even long after the regime fell.
Similarly, in Maoist China, the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976) weaponized citizen surveillance and encouraged individuals—especially students and youth—to denounce so-called counter-revolutionaries, including their own family members. The Chinese Communist Party used this network of informants to control thought, stifle dissent, and maintain its iron grip on power. The result was a society consumed by fear, where countless people were publicly humiliated, imprisoned, or executed based on flimsy or false accusations made by ordinary citizens seeking favor or avoiding suspicion.
In Soviet Russia under Stalin, the NKVD and later the KGB encouraged widespread informant culture. Children were urged to report on their parents, and neighbors were expected to spy on one another. This environment of constant surveillance and betrayal crushed solidarity, creating a society where fear and mistrust were the norm. The gulags were filled with individuals denounced by coworkers or acquaintances, often for trivial reasons or as part of political purges.
The danger of transforming a nation into a giant spy network is that it obliterates the social contract. When people feel that their fellow citizens could be informants, basic human interactions become fraught with suspicion. Creative expression is stifled, free speech vanishes, and people no longer feel safe being vulnerable or authentic. Even personal relationships become performative, as individuals constantly fear being reported for a stray comment or unpopular opinion. Over time, this breeds a form of learned helplessness, where people disengage from civic life, stop trusting their institutions, and view society as irreparably corrupt.
In the case of post-9/11 America, the expansion of mass surveillance and the gradual transformation of citizens into de facto informants—whether through neighborhood watch programs, corporate data collection, or social media monitoring—has already contributed to widespread paranoia and mistrust. The encouragement of citizens to report “suspicious activity” or potential threats has created an atmosphere where false reports, racial profiling, and social division have become more common. If this trend continues, the long-term result will be a deeply fractured society where citizens no longer view one another as members of a shared community but as potential threats to be watched, monitored, and exposed.
The fate of any country that turns its entire population into a spy network is a bleak one: mass alienation, the collapse of genuine human relationships, and the transformation of society into a police state. Over time, people become not only physically but psychologically imprisoned, unable to trust even their closest friends or family. This culture of perpetual suspicion ultimately weakens a nation’s resilience, making it easier for corrupt regimes to retain power while turning the citizens into oppressors of each other.
SECRETARY PETE HEGSETH
I saw something on social media today highlighting Secretary Hegseth’s tattoos, implying they suggest ties to White Nationalist groups. According to ChatGPT, the tattoos he has are actually military symbols that were later adopted by White Nationalists. I doubt Secretary Hegseth is a White Nationalist, but he might be a spy pretending to be one. Spies play games like this.
Spies sometimes play very complex games. They blur the lines between espionage tactics and genuine extremism, which makes it nearly impossible for the average citizen to discern who is truly dangerous versus who is simply playing a role. The problem with intelligence agencies and undercover operations using deception—such as pretending to be racists, white nationalists, or homophobes to infiltrate criminal groups—is that it creates a moral and ethical gray area. While some might argue that these tactics help gather intel and prevent actual crimes, they also create a dangerous precedent.
First, the obvious risk is that the agents playing these roles may become indistinguishable from the real thing. If a spy spends years pretending to be a white nationalist, for example, how can the public know whether he is only acting or actually holds those views? Worse, the spy might become radicalized in the process or find personal gain in the ideology they are faking. This creates a situation where the government itself might unknowingly harbor people with genuine extremist beliefs, hidden under the guise of espionage.
Second, the method itself is very un-American in spirit. It relies on deception, manipulation, and entrapment—tools that, when turned on American citizens, violate the principles of transparency, justice, and trust in government. It also corrodes the public’s ability to discern truth. When people see figures like Pete Hegseth accused of being a white nationalist due to his tattoos, the possibility that he could actually be a spy manipulating that narrative for profit or influence makes everything more suspicious and unstable. If Hegseth is a Checchi spy (or any kind of intelligence asset), then the tattoos could have been strategically chosen to bait extremists, create entrapment opportunities, or craft a false identity for infiltration. This kind of “double deception” makes it impossible for the public to know what is real.
Furthermore, these spy games foster cynicism and distrust. If spies pose as racists, then suddenly everyone accused of racism could claim they were “just playing a role,” which provides a convenient smokescreen for actual bigots. The same applies to other extremist identities. This makes accountability nearly impossible, which in turn erodes the credibility of justice.
While some might argue that these tactics occasionally do some good—taking down dangerous groups or preventing violence—the cost is often far greater. It normalizes deception as a governing principle. And since there is no transparency or oversight on these operations, the public has no way of knowing whether these spies are actually serving justice or just running profitable entrapment schemes that target naïve, gullible people for money, influence, or blackmail.
Ultimately, the whole game seems far more dangerous and counterproductive than useful. It creates a shadowy, deceptive culture where you can’t tell friend from foe, and it invites corruption. When you have spies running around pretending to be the very thing they claim to oppose, the American people become collateral damage in a psychological battlefield where nothing can be trusted. That’s not justice—it’s chaos, and it’s very un-American.
If I’m not mistaken, I met Pete Hegseth many years ago when I was bartending. He sat at the bar with his best friend (a guy whose name I can’t remember as I write this) for two or three hours, if my memory serves me. From that encounter, I can tell you he struck me as a very nice, down-to-earth person—easy to talk to and completely unpretentious. At that point in my life, I wasn’t yet paranoid about being stalked by CIA Checchi spies, but in retrospect, I suspect that’s what was happening. It seems likely he was there to inspect me, keep an eye on me, and report back about our interaction.
That said, he was not drunk, inappropriate, or in any way suggestive of White Nationalist views. It was just two military veterans sharing drinks, seemingly catching up. They had been friends for decades—since before they were married, if I recall correctly. Most of our conversation revolved around their various marriages and why they felt they were so bad at being married. (If I’m not mistaken, they had each been married three times and were doing some serious soul-searching about why their relationships kept failing. Bartenders often play the role of therapists—people tend to open up about their struggles and life questions. They included me in their conversation the entire time. It was just the three of us.)
That said, I didn’t think Hegseth belonged in the Secretary of Defense role, simply because he lacked the appropriate merit and experience. But now that he has the job, I’m rooting for him because his success is America’s success. On the positive side, it’s refreshing to see an ordinary person in any position of public service. I was shocked to see him wearing a baseball cap in front of the cameras. He’s someone new recruits will be able to relate to. Although following in the footsteps of Secretary of Defense men before him, must be some what intimidating. If his job description is to do what the commander and chief tells him to do, he should be able to do well.
However, I can’t help but cringe when I watch his media interviews. I feel bad for him. I know he’s a genuinely kind, smart, engaging and decent person, but he doesn’t come across that way on camera. Despite his years at Fox News, he seems green and uncomfortable in the political media spotlight. When I watch him, I can’t help but hope he leans into the good person I met at the bar that day—the one who was sincere, authentic, and relatable. If he can do that, I believe it’s an important part of being a great leader—the military deserves a great leader. The work they do is invaluable to our world and our country.
The current controversy dominating the news as I write this is "Signalgate," which revolves around Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's use of the Signal app to discuss sensitive military operations, including airstrikes in Yemen, with eighteen other Trump administration officials. The situation took a dramatic turn when someone “accidentally” included Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, in the group chat. Although Hegseth insists that no classified material was shared, experts and lawmakers are raising concerns about potential security breaches and the mishandling of sensitive information.
This situation reminds me of a time when I was a kid, and we went to see a traveling circus. When something went wrong during the show, they would bring out the clowns to distract the audience. This feels like another distraction – a CIA Checchi family clown show designed to divert attention and give the media something to focus on. Everyone is being manipulated into focusing on this - politicians, judicial professionals, journalists and even world leaders.
My SPY-D senses tell me this is just another spy game. It’s hard to believe that all eighteen people in that chat were genuinely involved in such a massive “scandal”—especially someone like Susie Wiles, who is widely recognized as a consummate professional and a no-nonsense leader. The whole thing reeks of political and military theater—a setup. It was reported that one of the people in the chat was inside the Kremlin at the time, and a journalist just "accidentally" ended up in the mix? This seems like classic CIA Checchi family manipulation. While I can’t fully explain their objectives in orchestrating this incident, one thing is clear: this is yet another Checchi family clown show, courtesy of America’s most manipulative, corrupt family. In the end, it will likely amount to nothing but noise and distraction. However, I’ll take one guess: since the Checchi family is always about money, the fact that Signal’s popularity surged a week after this drama hit the news suggests they may have a financial interest in the app. The sudden spike in downloads marked the largest growth period in Signal’s history. This entire stunt may very well have been engineered to boost the bottom line and popularity of the app.
If they do control this app, then they want as many people to use it as possible so that they can spy on the plans and conversations people are trying to hide. It’s possible the whole thing was orchestrated to increase the apps popularity and increase the amount of data they can collect – maybe even catching criminals and getting information from foreign countries. These are very sneaky people able to manipulate an entire array of political, military and journalistic sources to advance their own hidden agendas.
Their reach extends far beyond what most people can fathom, and they have the resources to create elaborate, multi-layered deceptions that serve multiple purposes. By staging this Signal scandal, they not only generate massive publicity for the app but also foster a false sense of security among users who now believe it is a trusted platform for private communication. In reality, if the Checchi family has influence or control over Signal, they can monitor sensitive conversations, gather intelligence, and potentially blackmail or manipulate individuals based on the information they collect.
Furthermore, this entire incident could serve as a smokescreen to obscure deeper, more nefarious operations happening behind the scenes. While the public and media are fixated on “Signalgate,” the Checchi family may be pulling strings elsewhere—conducting financial crimes, manipulating stock markets, or engineering new political crises. This is their modus operandi: create chaos to mask their real activities.
In the end, this so-called scandal is likely nothing more than another chapter in their long-running playbook of deception and power grabs. The true scandal isn't Signal or Hegseth’s use of it—it’s the vast, unchecked influence of the Checchi family itself, manipulating events from the shadows, turning technology, politics, and the media into mere pawns in their global chess game.